|submitted by eliazar to Bitcoin [link] [comments]|
|submitted by alanX to Bitcoin [link] [comments]|
submitted by bgrimes1101 to BitcoinBeginners [link] [comments]
submitted by vladdione to Economics [link] [comments]
|submitted by Aenanimus to NewsWhatever [link] [comments]|
|submitted by ulros to fbitcoin [link] [comments]|
|submitted by skitalo to Monero [link] [comments]|
|submitted by rythereum to Sweetbridge [link] [comments]|
|submitted by ABitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]|
|submitted by cryyptoexpert2020 to u/cryyptoexpert2020 [link] [comments]|
|submitted by antr to technology [link] [comments]|
|submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]|
submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAllTV [link] [comments]
|submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]|
|submitted by antr to Bitcoin [link] [comments]|
What is a complementary currency? It is a form of money that can be used alongside regular money.
What is the fundamental goal of this proposal? The two most fundamental goals motivating this proposal are to insulate local human subsistence and livelihood from the vicissitudes of national and international economic cycles and financial speculation, and to provide tangible and attractive incentives for people to live and consume more sustainably. It also seeks to provide authorities with a means to employ social security expenditures to channel consumption in sustainable directions and encourage economic diversity and community resilience at the local level.
Why should the state administrate the reform? The nation is currently the most encompassing political entity capable of administrating an economic reform of this nature. Ideally it is also subservient to the democratic decisions of its population. The current proposal is envisaged as an option for European nations, but would seem equally advantageous for countries anywhere. If successfully implemented within a particular nation or set of nations, the system can be expected to be emulated by others. Whereas earlier experiments with alternative currencies have generally been local, bottom-up initiatives, a state-supported program offers advantages for long-term success. Rather than an informal, marginal movement connected to particular identities and transient social networks, persisting only as long as the enthusiasm of its founders, the complementary currency advocated here is formalized, efficacious, and lastingly fundamental to everyone's economy.
How is local use defined and monitored? The complementary currency (CC) can only be used to purchase goods and services that are produced within a given geographical radius of the point of purchase. This radius can be defined in terms of kilometers of transport, and it can vary between different nations and regions depending on circumstances. A fairly simple way of distinguishing local from non-local commodities would be to label them according to transport distance, much as is currently done regarding, for instance, organic production methods or "fair trade." Such transport certification would of course imply different labelling in different locales.
How is the complementary currency distributed? A practical way of organizing distribution would be to provide each citizen with a plastic card which is electronically charged each month with the sum of CC allotted to him or her.
Who are included in the category of citizens? A monthly CC is provided to all inhabitants of a nation who have received official residence permits.
What does basic income mean? Basic income is distributed without any requirements or duties to be fulfilled by the recipients. The sum of CC paid to an individual each month can be determined in relation to the currency's purchasing power and to the individual's age. The guiding principle should be that the sum provided to each adult should be sufficient to enable basic existence, and that the sum provided for each child should correspond to the additional household expenses it represents.
Why would people want to use their CC rather than regular money? As the sum of CC provided each month would correspond to purchases representing a claim on his or her regular budget, the basic income would liberate a part of each person's regular income and thus amount to substantial purchasing power, albeit restricted only to local purchases. The basic income in CC would reduce a person's dependence on wage labor and the risks currently associated with unemployment. It would encourage social cooperation and a vitalization of community.
Why would businesses want to accept payment in CC? Business entrepreneurs can be expected to respond rapidly to the radically expanded demand for local products and services, which would provide opportunities for a diverse range of local niche markets. Whether they receive all or only a part of their income in the form of CC, they can choose to use some of it to purchase tax-free local labor or other inputs, and to request to have some of it converted by the authorities to regular currency (see next point).
How is conversion of CC into regular currency organized? Entrepreneurs would be granted the right to convert some of their CC into regular currency at exchange rates set by the authorities.The exchange rate between the two currencies can be calibrated so as to compensate the authorities for loss of tax revenue and to balance the in- and outflows of CC to the state. The rate would thus amount to a tool for determining the extent to which the CC is recirculated in the local economy, or returned to the state. This is important in order to avoid inflation in the CC sector.
Would there be interest on sums of CC owned or loaned? There would be no interest accruing on a sum of CC, whether a surplus accumulating in an account or a loan extended.
How would saving and loaning of CC be organized? The formal granting of credit in CC would be managed by state authorities and follow the principle of full reserve banking, so that quantities of CC loaned would never exceed the quantities saved by the population as a whole.
Would the circulation of CC be subjected to taxation? No.
Why would authorities want to encourage tax-free local economies? Given the beneficial social and ecological consequences of this reform, it is assumed that nation states will represent the general interests of their electorates and thus promote it. Particularly in a situation with rising fiscal deficits, unemployment, health care, and social security expenditures, the proposed reform would alleviate financial pressure on governments. It would also reduce the rising costs of transport infrastructure, environmental protection, carbon offsetting, and climate change adaptation. In short, the rising costs and diminishing returns on current strategies for economic growth can be expected to encourage politicians to consider proposals such as this, as a means of avoiding escalating debt or even bankruptcy.
How would the state's expenditures in CC be financed? As suggested above, much of these expenditures would be balanced by the reduced costs for social security, health care, transport infrastructure, environmental protection, carbon offsetting, and climate change adaptation. As these savings may take time to materialize, however, states can choose to make a proportion of their social security payments (pensions, unemployment insurance, family allowance, etc.) in the form of CC. As between a third and half of some nations' annual budgets are committed to social security, this represents a significant option for financing the reform, requiring no corresponding tax levies.
What are the differences between this CC and the many experiments with local currencies? This proposal should not be confused with the notion, or with the practical operation, of local currencies, as it does not imply different currencies in different locales but one national,complementary currency for local use. Nor is it locally initiated and promoted in opposition to theregular currency, but centrally endorsed and administrated as an accepted complement to it. Most importantly, the alternative currency can only be used to purchase products and services originating from within a given geographical range, a restriction which is not implemented in experiments with Local Exchange Trading Systems (LETS). Finally, the CC is provided as a basic income to all residents of a nation, rather than only earned in proportion to the extent to which a person has made him- or herself useful in the local economy.
What would the ecological benefits be? The reform would radically reduce the demand for long-distance transport, the production of greenhouse gas emissions, consumption of energy and materials, and losses of foodstuffs through overproduction, storage, and transport. It would increase recycling of nutrients and packaging materials, which means decreasing leakage of nutrients and less garbage. It would reduce agricultural intensification, increase biodiversity, and decrease ecological degradation and vulnerability.
What would the societal benefits be? The reform would increase local cooperation, decrease social marginalization and addiction problems, provide more physical exercise, improve psycho-social and physical health, and increase food security and general community resilience. It would decrease the number of traffic accidents, provide fresher and healthier food with less preservatives, and improved contact between producers and consumers.
What would the long-term consequences be for the economy? The reform would no doubt generate radical transformations of the economy, as is precisely the intention. There would be a significant shift of dominance from transnational corporations founded on financial speculation and trade in industrially produced foodstuffs, fuels, and other internationally transported goods to locally diverse producers and services geared to sustainable livelihoods. This would be a democratic consequence of consumer power, rather than of legislation. Through a relatively simple transformation of the conditions for market rationality, governments can encourage new and more sustainable patterns of consumer behavior. In contrast to much of the drastic and often traumatic economic change of the past two centuries, these changes would be democratic and sustainable and would improve local and national resilience.
Why should society want to encourage people to refrain from formal employment? It is increasingly recognized that full or high employment cannot be a goal in itself, particularly if it implies escalating environmental degradation and energy and material throughput. Well-founded calls are thus currently made for degrowth, i.e. a reduction in the rate of production of goods and services that are conventionally quantified by economists as constitutive of GDP. Whether formal unemployment is the result of financial decline, technological development, or intentional policy for sustainability, no modern nation can be expected to leave its citizens economically unsupported. To subsist on basic income is undoubtedly more edifying than receiving unemployment insurance; the CC system encourages useful community cooperation and creative activities rather than destructive behavior that may damage a person's health.
Why should people receive an income without working? As observed above, modern nations will provide for their citizens whether they are formally employed or not. The incentive to find employment should ideally not be propelled only by economic imperatives, but more by the desire to maintain a given identity and to contribute creatively to society. Personal liberty would be enhanced by a reform which makes it possible for people to choose to spend (some of) their time on creative activities that are not remunerated on the formal market, and to accept the tradeoff implied by a somewhat lower economic standard. People can also be expected to devote a greater proportion of their time to community cooperation, earning additional CC, which means that they will contribute more to society – and experience less marginalization – than the currently unemployed.
Would savings in CC be inheritable? No.
How would transport distances of products and services be controlled? It is reasonable to expect the authorities to establish a special agency for monitoring and controlling transport distances. It seems unlikely that entrepreneurs would attempt to cheat the system by presenting distantly produced goods as locally produced, as we can expect income in regular currency generally to be preferable to income in CC. Such attempts would also entail transport costs which should make the cargo less competitive in relation to genuinely local produce, suggesting that the logic of local market mechanisms would by and large obviate the problem.
How would differences in local conditions (such as climate, soils, and urbanism) be dealt with?It is unavoidable that there would be significant variation between different locales in terms of the conditions for producing different kinds of goods. This means that relative local prices in CC for agiven product can be expected to vary from place to place. This may in turn mean that consumption patterns will vary somewhat between locales, which is predictable and not necessarily a problem. Generally speaking, a localization of resource flows can be expected to result in a more diverse pattern of calibration to local resource endowments, as in premodern contexts. The proposed system allows for considerable flexibility in terms of the geographical definition of what is categorized as local, depending on such conditions. In a fertile agricultural region, the radius for local produce may be defined, for instance, as 20 km, whereas in a less fertile or urban area, it may be 50 km. People living in urban centers are faced with a particular challenge. The reform would encourage an increased production of foodstuffs within and in the vicinity of urban areas, which in the long run may also affect urban planning. People might also choose to move to the countryside, where the range of subsistence goods that can be purchased with CC will tend to be greater. In the long run, the reform can be expected to encourage a better fit between the distribution of resources (such as agricultural land) and demography. This is fully in line with the intention of reducing long-distance transports of necessities.
What would the consequences be if people converted resources from one currency sphere into products or services sold in another? It seems unfeasible to monitor and regulate the use of distant imports (such as machinery and fuels) in producing produce for local markets, but as production for local markets is remunerated in CC, this should constitute a disincentive to invest regular money in such production processes. Production for local consumption can thus be expected to rely mostly – and increasingly – on local labor and other resource inputs.
Transforming industry and society: blockchain beyond the coin Kevin Curran, IEEE senior member, security professor at Ulster University and editor of the Journal of British Blockchain Association (JBBA), explains how blockchain has transformed industry and society. Read here
When we mention Bitcoin, many people's first impression is Bitcoin. In the current Financial investment products, Bitcoin's earning rate is ranked at the first place globally,which created many investment miracles. When we talk about why bitcoin is so valuable,fewer people can explain it clearly.submitted by AITDBlockchai to u/AITDBlockchai [link] [comments]
If we really want to understand the Fortune secrets of Bitcoin. First, we need to understand the historical birth backgrounds of Bitcoin and it's value logic.The outbreak of the Financial crisis was in 2008 worldwide, multiple international banks and financial institutions were going to file bankruptcy,many investors were losing all their Fortune, there was a recession happenned in the Financial Market.
At the end of 2008, a person who claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto published Bitcoin White Paper "Bitcoin:A P2P Digital Cash System" on 1st November,has announced the birth of Bitcoin since then. In the beginning of 2009,Genesis Block was officially uploaded on chain .
The appearance of Bitcoin was bringing new directions and hopes to the dismal financial market at that moment.Comparing to traditional paper currency, Bitcoin is possessing the following two competitive advantages:
First, there are no central publishing organizations, which means that the generation of Bitcoin and flow of Bitcoin will not be controlled by any central organizations.Due to the effect of financial storm, multiple global banks were going to file bankruptcy, investors have no where to file complaint, people have negative feelings toward banks which held currency distribution rights.The creation of Bitcoin was avoiding the problem of "publisher break down" which investors are paying more attention to.
Second, Never exceed the limit. The total amount for Bitcoin distribution is 21million dollars, number setting has written in Smart contract.Tamper prove, distribution amount limitation, all these traits confirm the non-existance of Bitcoin inflation .Many countries are suffering inflation problems,the most typical example is Venezuela. Due to years of inflation, the economic situation is that " Bank note is cheaper than toilet paper".
Two revolutionized advantages allow Bitcoin to become the star of Financial industry ,pursued and flattered by many investors. At the sametime, the layer technique possessed tamper proved traits in Bitcoin, ensuring reliability for investor's each transaction .Therefore,Bitcoin's financial status and industry value are skyrocketing in 10years after Bitcoin created which can be considered as normal phenomenon.
According to the public emergence of Bitcoin,mainstream economists started changing their attitude towards Bitcoin. The beginning analysation topic for Bitcoin is that "Is Bitcoin a trap?", but now the topic turns to be "Will Bitcoin become the mainstream currency in the future?
Now, some countries and organizations are starting Bitcoin payments, people's acceptance rate is increasing for Bitcoin, which means that Bitcoin will be accepted by more countries around the globe as an encrypted currency industry lead.
Next episode preview: Consensus Algorithm ,Encrypted World's Fortune distribution standard rule.
The price how to buy bitcoin with cash in germany bitcoins has gone through bitcoin explained by economist bitcoin platform of appreciation and depreciation referred to by some as bubbles and busts. Bitcoin is useful for crowdfunding. Archived from the original on 16 January Bitcoin scalability problem History of Bitcoin cryptocurrency crash Twitter bitcoin scam. The Czech real estate agency ... Economist Explains The State Of Bitcoin November 14, 2018 By Robert Johnson. Share with your friends . Wechat Breaking News / Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a currency which is unpredictable. In fact, the crypto market as a whole is volatile and subject change on an hourly basis, so, there’s no way of knowing what will happen tomorrow, the day after that and so on. This is why cryptocurrency investment ... Tendayi Kapfidze, the chief economist at America's largest online lending marketplace LendingTree, is convinced that Bitcoin is nothing more than a pyramid scheme. During a recent panel discussion, he told Yahoo! Finance that you could only become rich based on the number of people that join the market after you. The Economist explains How does Bitcoin work? The virtual currency is decentralised, which is part of its appeal. Explaining the world, daily The Economist explains. Apr 12th 2013. by T.S. BITCOIN ... Kenneth Rogoff, a Harvard professor and the former IMF chief economist, wrote in an Guardian op-ed that Bitcoin's long-term value would more likely be $100 than $100,000.
[index]          
Bitcoin and cryptocurrency mining explained with the Byzantine Generals Problem. We use it to explain the essence of cryptocurrency mining. https://www.udemy... Total worldwide debt is expected to continue growing over the coming months, despite having just climbed to a fresh all-time high. Given the three previous w... Heritage Explains Bitcoin The Heritage Foundation COMMENTARY Government Regulation This week, Norbert Michel, director of Heritage’s Center for Data Analysis, explains how Bitcoin works and ... In this video I will let you know what i think about the current price levels in crypto and coins like Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Litecoin (LTC) .... Keep in mind that this is just my personal ... bitcoin explained simply bitcoin explained reddit what is bitcoin what is bitcoin mining what is bitcoin worth what is bitcoin backed by what is bitcoin payment what is bitcoin address what is ...